Under Philippine laws, the employee and employer have reciprocal rights: the employee may not be forced to serve against his or her will, and the employer may not be compelled to keep an employee if there is legal reason to end the employment.
When employment is terminated by the employer, the question that often arises is: is the employee entitled to separation pay?
Separation pay refers to the amount an employee receives at the end of his employment to serve as financial relief.
Employers, however, are not obliged to grant separation pay in all cases. The circumstances surrounding each case must be assessed to determine if separation pay is legally required.
Lawful Termination
To legally terminate an employment, the employer must comply with two types of requirements: substantive and procedural.
Substantive requirements involve the reason for termination. Legally accepted reasons are classified as one of the following:
- Just cause
- Authorized cause
Procedural requirements refer to the steps that have to be taken in the course of the termination.
Just Cause for Termination
Just cause refers to employee’s actions that result in serious consequences to the company’s operations and/or profitability. These include:
- Serious misconduct
- Willful disobedience of a superior’s lawful order (commonly known as insubordination)
- Gross and habitual neglect of duties
- Serious breach of employer’s trust
Authorized Cause for Termination
An authorized cause for termination is a circumstance or condition that compels the employer to end an employment through no fault of the employee. It is premised on the concept that the employer has the right to run the business according to what he believes is best for it.
These circumstances and conditions include:
- Introduction of a device that saves on labor
- Redundancy
- Financial losses necessitating employee retrenchment
- Cessation of business
- Employee’s illness which threatens his or other employees’ safety, and is not curable in six months
- Imposed extended leave exceeding six months through no fault of the employee
In all these circumstances, the employer will be asked to show proof that the reason to terminate is legitimate and valid.
Due Process
Termination of employment has to be done in steps.
For just cause terminations, the steps involve:
- Giving the employee written notice of the offenses charged against him. The notice must indicate possible termination if the charges are proven.
- Giving the employee the opportunity to refute the charges, confront his accusers and their witnesses, and present his own witnesses and evidences.
- Giving the employee a second notice if it is determined that the employee has indeed committed the offenses.
For authorized cause terminations, the steps are:
- Issuing a notice of termination to the employee 30 days before the end of employment.
- Issuing a similar notice to the Department of Labor and Employment 30 days before the end of employment.
When is separation pay required?
Just cause terminations:
If the offense charged against the employee is proven, the employer is not required to grant separation pay. But if the employer fails to observe due process, he may be financially liable to the employee, even as the dismissal is upheld.
Authorized cause terminations:
In most situations, the employer is required to grant separation pay. In cases of introduction of labor-saving processes and of redundancy, separation pay is typically one month’s salary for every year of service. In cases of retrenchment due to financial losses, cessation of business or illness, separation pay is normally half month’s pay for every year of service or one month’s pay, whichever is higher.
If the business was closed due to severe financial losses, it may be exempt from granting separation pay.
There could be other circumstances that would determine the need for separation pay or the amount to be paid. Consult our lawyers at Duran & Duran-Schulze Law to learn more.
27 Responses
Comments navigation
Pano Po kaya sa sitwasyon ko.. 9 years Po ako sa company Namin pero Wala Po akong pinipirmahan n contract “Ang natatabdaan ko lang Po n pinirmahan ko Yung 3 months lang Po n nakasaad sa contrata pero after Po noon Wala n Hanggang umabot n Po ako Ng 9 years sa company. Tanong ko Po Sana Kong entitled Po ba ako sa separation pay or Anu p pong mga benifits Ang pwede ko Po makuha sa company na pinagtatrabahuhan ko. SalamT po
I have dismissed without prior notice
What should I do
I have worked in college till today. I. e
8-12-2022, as a lecturer in accountancy for period of 4montgs 8days . Suddenly today at12.30 P M that college principal called me and
Said I need not come to college from tomorrow onwards. I didn’t do damage either to college or anything person in college what should do now
good day, i’m Resty Oril, i was dismissed from the PNP services last Dec. 4, 2015, for the case of RA 9262, that i caught my live in partner that she was an another party involved that she was said is not true. after 3months the said party involved was already in partner and got already a child, my case in RIAS at region 1 by the hearing officer it was only given me suspension for 60 days, upon summited to the regional director Roman Felix he was given me a dismissed order, the regional internal affair region 1 was refuse to give a copy of the order coming from the hearing officer. when i was submitted to the affiliate board Napolcom, the lawyer of napolcom said that RD descision. the questions is. where is my right to defend my side, because i don’t have money?now the complainant and third party involved was already a child and when the case is proceeding she was said that my reason is only my allegation. now I’ want to as that “pwede kopa po bang ilaban sa court ang karapatan ko kahitmatagalna akung natangal sa serbisyo..
good day, i’m Resty Oril, i was dismissed from the PNP services last Dec. 4, 2015, for the case of RA 9262, that i caught my live in partner that she an an another party involved that she was said is not true. after 3months the said party involved was already in partner and got already a child, my case in RIAS at region 1 by the hearing officer it was only suspended for 60 days, upon summited to the regional director Roman Felix he was given me a dismissed order, the regional internal affair region 1 was refuse to give a copy of the order coming from the hearing officer. when i was submitted to the affiliate board Napolcom, the lawyer of napolcom said that RD descision. the questions is. where is my right to defend my side, because i don’t have money?now the complainant and third party involved was already a child and when the case is proceeding is they are said that my reason is alligation. now i want to as that “pwede kopa po bang ilaban sa court ang karapatan ko.
Comments navigation